Monday, April 25, 2011
Does Social Media Have a Place in Clinical Trials?
A new clinical trial conducted through social media found that lithium didn't slow the progression of Lou Gehrig's disease. The new study, published in the journal Nature Biotechnology, is one of the first conducted exclusively through social media. But many are questioning the validity of the data given the strict procedures required to constitute a clinical trial.
"The approach has tremendous potential,'' said Lee Hartwell, a Nobel Prize-winning scientist now at Arizona State University. Dr. Hartwell, who wasn't involved in the study, said social-network trials aren't likely to replace conventional randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trials, the gold-standard for generating medical evidence. But such trials have become so complicated and time-consuming that new models are needed, he said.
ePharma Summit West features a number of sessions focused on getting the most from social media, not only through speaking, but also through listening. Join us for sessions such as Partnering with Patient Advocates and Consumer Opinion Leaders, Patients Take Center Stage: Extending Quality of Life Through the Shift Toward the Consumer, and Dr. James Fowler's keynote presentation "Connected: The Power of Social Networks on Life Sciences and Health." Register using the code XP1656BLOG and save 10%
Paul Wicks, a co-author of the paper, said social network-run studies may be most useful for testing efficacy of so-called off-label or off-patent compounds that patients are using but are unlikely to ever attract pharmaceutical company interest.
More than 4,300 patients are on the PatientsLikeMe ALS site, where they frequently share information on how their disease is progressing and strategies they are using to fight it. Jamie Heywood, chairman and co-founder of PatientsLikeMe, said the idea for the new study came from patients. After the 2008 paper reporting lithium slowed down the disease in 16 ALS patients, some members of the site suggested posting their experiences with the drug in an online spreadsheet to figure out if it was working. PatientsLikeMe offered instead to run a more rigorous observational study with members of the network to increase chances of getting a valid result.
The company developed a tool to standardize collection of patient data, including lithium blood levels in patients. They used a questionnaire from conventional ALS trials to gather patients' self-reported data on functions such as swallowing, walking, and breathing.
Mr. Heywood said the result was apparent nine months after the study was launched. Conventional trials typically take more time just to enroll patients, he noted. Costs for drugs and recruiting patients were avoided.
Merit Cudkowicz, an ALS researcher at Harvard Medical School who was an investigator on a standard lithium clinical trial, said social network-generated data can offer valuable insights, but she cautioned that the PatientsLikeMe study was not a substitute for more rigorous studies. Two conventional on-going ALS studies are designed to see if lithium has a very small effect on survival, something the PatientsLikeMe study wouldn't be able to pick up.
at 4:35:00 PM